Bookmark www.milnet.com Contact milnet@milnet.com
_____________________________________________________________________________________
As world leaders including the United States, Russia, Britain and
others from the European Union attempt to deal with the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, it remains clear that the terrorists continue to set the agenda.
Terrorism: Still A Tool of Negative Diplomacy
Diplomats come together, decide on a rational course of action. Leaders in the area of conflict agree to disagree in some areas and in others find common ground. An accord is reached and a light suddenly appears at the end of the long tunnel leading out of the violence. Then terrorists with an agenda that clearly rejects a peaceful solution at any cost send in a bomb.
Anyone familiar with the British and Irish conflict will tell you this seems all too familiar. Only today it is a repeating scenario in Israel. With U.S. attempting to broker a peace between the Israelis and Palestinians, violence erupts not once but now appears to be on schedule for a daily occurance.
The factions all appear to be fighting against a peaceful solution, clearly spelling out their interests -- not in a Palestinian homeland, not a place for thousands of refugees to better their conditions. Instead it remains clear that violence and death to Israelis is the goal.
Hamas, Hezbollah, Matyrs Brigade, Islamic Jihad. All claim responsibility in attacks over the last few months. And as the U.S. attempts to pull together a solution between the two parties, the Martyrs Brigade claims to have sent in a bomber just as Vice President Cheney meets with Israel's leaders and sends the message to Arafat to demonstrate good intentions -- no more violence. But the terrorists don't respond. Arafat is clearly not in control of anyone in the occupied territories and it is just as clear that the terrorists are out of control.
It matters not what Israel does or does not do at this point. It matters not what outside parties council, and there is no amount of diplomacy, in the traditional sense anyway, that will resolve this situtation.
The terrorist factions are clearly at war with Israel and have gone
beyond talk. Their form of diplomacy has totally degraded to death.
Innocent refugees are being used as shields to the terrorists, living among
them and sneaking out to kill Israelis at every opportunity. It has
become a way of life, and the protest angle is long gone.
What is Left?
When a nation is threatened from within, a police state is the likely result. In the case of Israel, it has attempted to surround the pockets where the terrorists live. The result has been checkpoint killings. Rather than a mistake, it seems the Israeli strategy is useful. Since checkpoints were the sites of attacks, it is clear the strategy was working. However, no amount of checkpoints can completely close off the terrorists from the rest of the country. Suicide bombers still made it into cities.
Rolling tanks into the refugee camps and rounding up terrorists seemed to be a good answer, except that nothing changed.
Neighboring Jordon, Syria, and Lebanon have done nothing to help.
In fact, Syria and Lebanon together have allowed the terrorists refuge,
but not the Palestinians. There has been no offer to allow Palestinian
refugees to live and work in either country. And since no one wants
them, why is it a surprise that Israel faces the problem? The reasoning
points to only one conclusion.
Hoping for Israeli Collapse
The Arab nations are happy to have Israel facing this problem. They hope for the eventual collapse of the Israeli government and the death of a nation.
Even the cynical Saudi proclamation of a solution that is exactly the same as the solution offered time and time again speaks to the hypocrisy of the Arab world.
Did the United Nations err when granting Jews a homeland in 1947? Perhaps. Did the U.N. discount the effects on the nomads that have squatted on the land in question for centuries? Absolutely.
Few people understand that the U.N. is barely a democratic organization. It is a socialist organization that, like the cold war Soviet Union, has weighted votes and vetos that fails to provide a democratic process. While it proposes to offer hope for peace, it has a horrible record at doing so. And while it has lofty ambitions, it has flawed solutions and attempts to go far beyond its original mandate. And of course, it has no real authority. Look at its dismal record with Iraq and NBC weapons inspections. It is clearly as much a failure as an organization as peace talks in Israel.
So we have a failed organization's original sin, the grant of land to
the Jews in 1947, that they have built into an economic power worthy of
jealous Arab nations, but being crippled within from Palestinian refugees
suborned by anti-Jew terrorist groups who refuse to give peace a chance
-- continuing to fight to destroy Israel the nation.
A Red Neck Solution
Some hard liners in Israel have been calling for the expulsion, in entirity,
of the Palestinian population. An impossible task, it presents only
an over-simplified approach to solving the problem. Why is so difficult?
© Copyright, 2002, Michael Crawford, MILNET
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
distributed worldwide
by AFI Research
afi@supanet.com