The Consequences of Withdrawal from Iraq
RYAN MAURO (TDCAnalyst@aol.com)
 

Over 3,000 Americans have been killed and depending on which number you believe, Iraqi casualties are either in the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands. Progress has been stalled, mistakes have been made, and the purpose of the mission seems unclear. The temptation for a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq is prevalent, and understandable. Watching young soldiers die in a far away land, leaving behind broken families is heart-wrenching and our policy should be to minimize such pain wherever possible.

             For every American killed, there are numerous Iraqis suffering the same pain, whether it is from malnutrition, terrorist attacks, or sectarian violence. Rightly so, the American people are asking for an alternative to the daily images on their TV screens of chaos and bombardment. However, our search for an end to the suffering must be responsible, and must not lead to more suffering and pain for us to suffer shortly thereafter. While the ideas and passion behind those calling for a withdrawal from Iraq are noble, we must not give in to their vision that a loss in Iraq would bring peace and security to those of us at home. This is not an issue of Democrat or Republican, and is certainly not an issue over whether we should have invaded Iraq in the first place. The most anti-war citizen must face the reality that we are in Iraq, and that mistake can not be erased by simply leaving. The following is a list of consequences that any advocate of a withdrawal must consider:
 

Moral Consequences

Military Consequences

Consequences in Iraq

Consequences in the Middle East

Consequences in Africa

Consequences in the War on Terror
 
Consequences in Latin America

Consequences in Asia

The consequences of a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq are not limited to Iraqi territory, or even to the region. They are felt worldwide, in every conflicted nation and every oppressed people. Some of the scenarios above may come to pass regardless of a withdrawal, but a withdrawal would guarantee these outcomes, and certainly exasperate them. The most immediate consequence would obviously be a base for terrorists in Iraq, who would find access to the oil revenue they previously never possessed in Afghanistan. The terrorists who attacked us on September 11, 2001 would find themselves in possession of even greater resources, and would be free to finance as they wish, arm as they wish, and build any kind of weapon they wish, in order to kill innocent Americans. Withdrawing from Iraq would not end the war, it would prolong it. Some ignorant Americans argue we aren’t at war, but I’d ask such Americans to take a visit to Ground Zero, or talk to our Iraqi allies, or read any of Osama Bin Laden’s statements.

Everyone wants to live in a safer, more secure world and for that reason, advocates of an immediate withdrawal from Iraq must reconsider the consequences of such an action. No compassionate American wants a soldier away from his or her family, but short-sighted, emotion-based reactions such as is being proposed would only guarantee such a scenario. The time is tough, and the President is responsible for the mistakes we have made in Iraq. Every such mistake he has made, though, would pale in comparison to the mistake of ceding victory and the future of the world to the terrorists we came to know on September 11, 2001.




If you'd like to sign up for Ryan's WorldThreats.com newsletter, simply drop him a note at TDCAnalyst@aol.com