The Consequences of Withdrawal from Iraq
Over 3,000 Americans
have been
killed and depending on which number you believe, Iraqi casualties are
either
in the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands. Progress has been
stalled,
mistakes have been made, and the purpose of the mission seems unclear.
The
temptation for a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq is prevalent, and
understandable. Watching young soldiers die in a far away land, leaving
behind
broken families is heart-wrenching and our policy should be to minimize
such
pain wherever possible.
For every American killed, there
are numerous Iraqis suffering the same pain, whether it is from
malnutrition,
terrorist attacks, or sectarian violence. Rightly so, the American
people are
asking for an alternative to the daily images on their TV screens of
chaos and
bombardment. However, our search for an end to the suffering must be
responsible, and must not lead to more suffering and pain for us to
suffer
shortly thereafter. While the ideas and passion behind those calling
for a
withdrawal from Iraq are noble, we must not give in to their vision
that a loss
in Iraq would bring peace and security to those of us at home. This is
not an
issue of Democrat or Republican, and is certainly not an issue over
whether we
should have invaded Iraq in the first place. The most anti-war citizen
must
face the reality that we are in Iraq, and that mistake can not be
erased by
simply leaving. The following is a list of consequences that any
advocate of a
withdrawal must consider:
Moral Consequences
- There are 25 million Iraqis engaged in
the battlefield of Iraq, and hundreds of millions of Arabs and other
Muslims whose fate will be decided by Iraq and the region’s future.
There can be no more selfish act that to deny the Iraqis, who have
fought and died along our side, the security, freedom and optimistic
future for their families that we so cherish.
- Withdrawal would mean watching by as
millions of Iraqis were slaughtered by terrorists, insurgents,
militias, and neighboring states as each struggles to take the spoils.
We would also have to watch as hundreds of thousands of children die
from treatable diseases, as any humanitarian effort would fail due to
the violence.
- Advocates of withdrawal also must be
willing to sacrifice the potential for freedom-loving people in the
region. Democratic success in Iraq threatens nearby tyrannies and
empowers those fighting them. Women who aren’t allowed to drive and are
persecuted for showing skin, young girls who are stoned for being
raped, homosexuals who are hung for their relationships, student
activists who are tortured in jail for criticizing their leader must be
looked in the face and be told, “The Americans didn’t feel your plight
was a high enough priority. We wish you success in the future, but this
superpower won’t be around to help you.”
Military Consequences
- Senator John McCain, a former POW in
Vietnam, said it best this week when he stated that “the only thing
worse than a stressed military, is a broken and defeated military.”
Withdrawal would mean the complete collapse of morale in the military
and a reluctance to support a responsible military budget. Failing to
support and fund our military leaves our troops without the armor they
need and our political leaders without the option of force in dealing
with foreign enemies.
- Advocates of a withdrawal think it
will end the war, but it will not. The disastrous security situation in
Iraq will lead to a terrorist sanctuary that the United States will
then have to confront. Our uniformed men and women who came home the
first time will have to enter again under much harsher and costlier
conditions.
Consequences in Iraq
- Withdrawal would lead to a collapse of
the elected Iraqi government, who all would then have to flee outside
the region or be executed by terrorists. All the work done to bring
about elections and representation for all the people of Iraq would
vanish.
- In southern Iraq, the “Islamization”
process would move full throttle, stripping away individual rights,
particularly that of women. As Islamic extremist rule increases, and
Iran grows more powerful, a radical Shiite state will be created that
will oppress not only its own citizens, but seek to oppress others.
- Sectarian violence will spiral out of
control, killing millions of Iraqis, both Sunni and Shia. Even more
will be forced to flee their homes as radical militias seek to create
homogenous regions. Shiite terrorist groups like Hezbollah will likely
find safe haven and support.
- Sunni territory will become home to an
assortment of terrorist organizations that will use it as a base to
fund and plan attacks on the United States and nearby moderate Muslim
nations. Al-Qaeda, who will certainly not hesitate to attack us again,
will have access to safe harbor, recruits, and oil revenue.
- The Kurds of northern Iraq will likely
declare independence, but will probably see a tremendous amount of
violence and despair, as continued below.
Consequences in
the
Middle East
- The voices of those who want freedom
and justice will be silenced. While the movement for democratic change
will continue, its prospects for victory will diminish and come at a
much higher cost.
- Iran, the #1 sponsor of terrorism and
home to several Al-Qaeda leaders, will grow in power and become the
leader of the region. It will become easier for Iran’s government, who
denies the holocaust has ever happened and has repeatedly cited the
destruction of Israel and the United States as its goal, to obtain
nuclear weapons. The West will find its options to deter isolate and
affect Iran’s behavior very limited.
- In response to the growth of Iran’s
power, countries in the region like Egypt, Algeria, Saudi Arabia,
Turkey, and the states in the Gulf will obtain nuclear weapons. Iran’s
leadership has expressed willingness to share its nuclear technology
with other rogue states like Syria and Venezuela.
- Saudi Arabia will increase its support
to Sunni jihadists and Wahhabists (which spawned Osama Bin Laden) in
order to counter Iran’s influence. There may very well be a bloody
civil war inside Saudi Arabia, causing oil prices to hit a new spike
and possibly bringing the American economy into a deep recession.
- Nearby countries will probably
increase the oppression of its dissidents in order to stifle any
attempt at foreign subversion.
- The growth in power of terrorist
elements will lead to a complete breakdown in the Middle East Peace
Process, and renewed fighting between Israeli and militant Palestinian
groups.
- Israel will have to take an even more
hawkish stance towards Iran, quite possibly leading to a nuclear
showdown.
- Turkey will invade northern Iraq to
stop the emergence of a Kurdish state, leading to yet another war. Iran
will almost certainly join in.
- One of the problems the United States
has had among Iraqis is that they don’t believe we will stay to protect
them, so they sit on the sidelines and won’t stand up to the
terrorists. A premature withdrawal would forever eliminate any goodwill
and trust between America and the people of the Middle East, instead
replaced by bitterness and hatred as its people watch their family
members die due to American selfishness. Any hope of having a foreign
ally would diminish, as no one would trust the United States to stand
by them in tough times.
Consequences in Africa
- The nuclear arms race may force Libya
to re-start its nuclear program.
- Iran would likely increase support to
organizations like the GIA in Algeria, furthering the civil war there.
- The United States would not have the
willpower to stop the genocide in Sudan. The Sudanese government, an
ally of Iran (and previously of Saddam Hussein), may find hope in
America’s withdrawal and increase, or at least stay focused on, their
brutal activities in Darfur.
Consequences in
the War
on Terror
- Terrorists worldwide will be
emboldened. The American withdrawal from Somalia helped motivate Osama
Bin Laden into thinking that he could attack us in the 1990s. An
American withdrawal from the much greater and more important conflict
in Iraq would surely inspire a new generation of terrorists.
Additionally, terrorists could go to Iraq to find training, money,
weapons and safe harbor. These recruits would then go on to attack
targets throughout the world, including Western Europe and the United
States.
- Rogue states would decide that
terrorists and insurgents are the way to defeat and deter America. An
immediate withdrawal would cause these nations to increase their
sponsorship of terrorist organizations.
Consequences in
Latin
America
- Venezuela’s missile and inevitable
nuclear cooperation with Iran would continue. The weakness of the
United States would encourage the rise of an anti-American bloc in
South America, led by Cuba and Venezuela that would ally itself with
Iran, China and Russia.
Consequences in Asia
- American forces would be unable to
block the shipment of drugs, banned goods, and WMD technology from
North Korea to the Middle East. This increased revenue would help shore
up North Korea’s oppressive regime, and allow them to arm our enemies.
- China’s rise in power would become
inevitable and accelerated, as our Asian allies doubted our
commitments, and would decide on appeasement and entering China’s
sphere of influence, rather than relying upon America.
- The new dynamics in Asia, with allies
of America questioning our strength, would result in a nuclear arms
race. Japan would have no option but to develop nuclear weapons
(although she may do so regardless). Two scenarios would arise: China
would dominate the Pacific and America’s status as a superpower would
quickly recede, or there would be a region wide nuclear stalemate
involving Burma, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, South Korea,
Japan, and possibly Taiwan and Australia.
The consequences of a
precipitous
withdrawal from Iraq are not limited to Iraqi territory, or even to the
region.
They are felt worldwide, in every conflicted nation and every oppressed
people.
Some of the scenarios above may come to pass regardless of a
withdrawal, but a
withdrawal would guarantee these outcomes, and certainly exasperate
them. The
most immediate consequence would obviously be a base for terrorists in
Iraq,
who would find access to the oil revenue they previously never
possessed in
Afghanistan. The terrorists who attacked us on September 11, 2001 would
find
themselves in possession of even greater resources, and would be free
to
finance as they wish, arm as they wish, and build any kind of weapon
they wish,
in order to kill innocent Americans. Withdrawing from Iraq would not
end the
war, it would prolong it. Some ignorant Americans argue we aren’t at
war, but
I’d ask such Americans to take a visit to Ground Zero, or talk to our
Iraqi
allies, or read any of Osama Bin Laden’s statements.
Everyone wants to
live in a safer,
more secure world and for that reason, advocates of an immediate
withdrawal
from Iraq must reconsider the consequences of such an action. No
compassionate
American wants a soldier away from his or her family, but
short-sighted,
emotion-based reactions such as is being proposed would only guarantee
such a
scenario. The time is tough, and the President is responsible for the
mistakes
we have made in Iraq. Every such mistake he has made, though, would
pale in
comparison to the mistake of ceding victory and the future of the world
to the
terrorists we came to know on September 11, 2001.
If you'd like to sign up for Ryan's WorldThreats.com newsletter,
simply drop him a note at TDCAnalyst@aol.com