AFI Research

Espionage & Security, Strategy & Risk Analysis and Armed Forces Intelligence
Global Information & Research Services for the News Media, MNC and OSINT Managers

Contact  afi@supanet.com   Bookmark  www.geocities.com/afi_research/AFIindex.html

To buy an expanded version of any of the stories below or to subscribe to the comprehensive range of press, publishing and business research services, analysis and scenario prediction available from AFI Research, please contact Richard M. Bennett
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please credit AFI Research if you use any part of this e-mail in any publication, website or broadcast

'America goes to War' Comprehensive coverage of the military buildup only at ORBAT.COM the USA's top orbat source.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

T-Nukes:  How Terrorists Will Get Their Nuclear Weapons

This article is intended to frighten you.  It is propoganda.  And it is fiction.  Unfortunately, it may be a true prediction.

'The Genesis of the New World of Terrorism

The scenario unfolds at the beginning of America's war on terrorism when the first tower of the World Trade Center collapased.  With all the right words, and all the correct justification, the U.S. has embarked upon a "patience lost" battle against Terrorism.  Few civilized people believe Terrorism can go unchecked, and even nations who have turned a blind eye to their extermist citizens or even other so-called friendly nations in the Middle East, suddenly realize, that except for the hand of God, there go I.  When terrorism moved from making simple stagecraft or blackmail for the release of prisoners, that new form of terrorism did indeed become a new form of war that frightened any country concerned with their welfare.  We make that distinction, because we don't think Saddam Hussein is particularly worried.  As a matryr and a supplier of terrorist needs whether it be weapons or finance, Hussein can pretty much be assured, no terrorist is going to be attacking Baghdad in the near future.  After all, he is a terrorist himself -- simply look at the expenditures on his retinue and military weapons programs compared to that spent on his starving, dieing people.

In any case, the scenario moves from those terrifying days of mourning over the attacks on the World Trade Center - phase two (least we forget they tried before), to those heady moments when the U.S. President, obviously angered, hurt and resolute declared war on Terrorism with every fiber of his soul, and the backing of his countrymen.

Unfortunately, barely two weeks after the disaster, the appeasement crowd, joined by the ever present pacifist anti-war radicals began a dis-information and propoganda campaign to instill doubt, fear, and lack of resolution in the American people.  Disgusting and traitorous in the eyes of most Americans, we know we have to allow it, at least to a certain degree, least we become a country like Iraq where no one speaks ill of the leadership with severe and usually terminal punishment.  But that set the stage for and continues to fuel the movement to appease the terrorists as illogical and ill fated as Chamberlain's incredibly stupid and naive return to Britain with his positive message from Chancellor Hitler.

Other forces began to play a few weeks ago.  Almost immediately, the Taliban government began a song and dance designed to hold onto power in that country.  As soon as Osama Bin Laden was intimated at being the lead terrorist behind the plot, Afghanistan began to look like a large hole in the ground.  Pakistan, right next door, also became a doubly dangerous place to live.  For the Taliban came from Pakistan, an export of ill-repute that the present government led by President Musharraf  immediately wished had never been born.  But born it was in the angry faces and ugly anti-western rhetoric of extermist Islamic schools, mosques and homes of the Middle East, and all too frequently in the streets.  Not only in Pakistan, and of course, not principally Pakistan.  For that struggling country was only one nest where terrorism is bred.  By no means the largest hotbed, and of course only a small player, Pakistan is, never-the-less,  the key player now on the stage of World Terrorism, and certainly  without asking to be placed there by the majority of its people who practice a much gentler form of the religion of Islam.

Why is Pakistan so important?  It is very simple.   There are four elements which make Pakistan the most dangerous place on the earth, even more frightening, a more frightening prospect than even Iraq or Afganisatan, more desperate than Lebanon or Syria, more deadly than Sudan, and perhaps more pivotal than Israel and the Palestinians.

Element Four

In reverse order of the elements that make up our concern,, we find Element Four:  A volatile and unpredictable Pakistani people spurred by extremist anti-western, anti-modernizations, fundamentalist culture.  "The old way is best" and "Western influence is evil" and "Attacks against the evil <fill in your favorite western nation> is okay".  These perversions of the rational thought process set the climate for the Islamic Jihad intoned by extremists the day Israel became a nation and was attacked that very day.  The fact that the climate continues and in countries distant from Israel confirms that this idealogy is as pervasive and evil as the virulent form of communism that produced a five decade long Cold War.

Element Three

Element Three is even more important:  The prospect of an instabile government in Pakistan.  Musharraf  is concerned.  And he well should be. With huge protests in the streets of his citizenry, both against his own policy to go along with the anti-terrorist coaltion, and the street player's incredibly violent anti-western dialogue, it is clear his tenure is threatened.  He has to hold his government together while walking the tightrope between keeping his citizens from general revolt, and begging for western retaliation for harboring or spawning the support structure for Osama Bin Laden.  It is only a short leap of logic to realize that the Taliban are the export spoken of earlier, an export from Pakistan that might not go unpunished.  In the middle, Musharraf  is in danger.  Fortunately he appears to have the strength to survive.  But what if he doesn't?  What are the stakes in the game if Pakistan loses Musharraf ?

Element Two

Element Two is the almost certain radicalization of the Pakistani government if Musharraf  is deposed.  While one would hope for rationale thinkers like former Information Minister Mushahid Hussain, the truth is that analysts doubt a non fundamentalist government would survive the downfall of Musharraf .  It is because of Element Four, the irrational, angry, fundamentalist element in Pakistan and it is because the country is, as Element Three intimates, the shakiness of the Pakistan government  that few doubt that if Mussaraf falls, so does Pakistan.  And fall it would, right into the hands of Osama Bin Laden.  The scenario at this point becomes a simple piece of logic.  The fundamentilist extremists of Pakistan spawned the self rightous Taliban -- a set of students of Islam incorrectly interpreting the most holy works of Islam into the virulent evil-speak of Islamic extremism preaching hate, death, and Jihad.  Osama Bin Laden is the poster child of the Taliban and that very same evil mantra of the extremist.  While living in a cave in Afghanistan, the Taliban's secret leader Bin Laden, could, and would, rule an extremist Pakistani government, if not by deed, by influence.  And that leads us to the most frightening element of all.

Element One

Element One is armageddon.  Again simple logic dictates what happens next.  With Osama Bin Laden's influence deep into the Pakistani government, with Jihad on the minds of everyone in power, the New Pakistan is a terrorist nation from top to bottom, with the silent majority of religious, reverent and anti-evil marginilized and forced into a corner where they no longer have any say in their country's future, and perhaps in its existence.  And that existence would be short lived.  As a terrorist nation, Pakistan would become the center of attention of the World's newly focused anti-terrorist, anti-extremist fervor.  And what happens to a nation with its very survival at stake?  Why they bring out their big guns, don't they?  And there-in lies armageddon.  Osama Bin Laden, if necessary can probably pull together $100 million despite the efforts to cut off his finances.  Whether he needs to or not, that money, presented to the Pakistani government as a gift or a payment, buys him the Terrorist's most sought after tool for striking back at the infidels -- the nuclear weapon.

Armageddon Is Truly Possible

So now that we have taken you to that horrible place in your mind, let's explore it just a little further.  We have been worried about nebulous reports of missing Soviet suitcase weapons.  We have seen Peacemaker, a movie correctly spelling out how easy it is to use a primary from a thermo-nuclear weapon as a backpack nuke.  Well, that is nothing compared to the very real and possible scenario of Pakistan happily handing over primaries or ready-to-go hydrogen weapons to people like Bin Laden, Khaddafi, or Hussein.   The nuclear option, as soon as it is in the hands of a terrorist, is coming to America, Britain, Germany, France, and eventually via the Chekneyans, Russia.  And some time after that, China too, who while hiding pretty effectively their own Islamic extremist terrorism problem, knows full well their own brand of terrorism within would not hesitate to use a nuclear weapon.

So there you have the worst case scenario.  It hinges greatly on maintaining a rational, anti-terrorist regime in Pakistan.  And perhaps, the pivotal events are taking place as we speak.  The western world must take great care in Pakistan, with what it asks Pakistan to do, and how its own actions protray Pakistan.  In fact, Pakistan becomes the center of the universe for a good long while.  And the Western world must also take great care to foster restraint in the country of India, a nation at odds with Pakistan since Pakistan separted its lands from that of India.  The Kashmir conflict must not be the trigger for the downfall of the Pakistani government thus that issue must be marginilized for a while.  And the western nations must take great care to provide the current government with the tools to continue their survival, which may mean a totally public hands-off approach, not involving Pakistan in the anti-terrorist efforts, and clearly dis-associating western influences, while quietly providing finance and support to the current regime.  And while the west might not particularly like how the current regime came into power, might not like their intractable approach to slow and painful movement to assist the ATC (Anti-Terrorist Coalition), we must keep in mind that a change in government now is VERY likely to quickly lead to a nuclear explosion in Chicago, Detroit, New York, Dallas, L.A. or San Francisco.  Or perhaps even Washington, London, Paris, Frankfurt, or Moscow.  And the leader of which ever nation receives that gift from Islamic extermism, will retaliate in kind or face a revolt in their own country.  A nuclear change that will change the world forever.

And for those reading this far and guffawing at the whole idea...just consider the intelligence facts behind the amount of money and efforts by Iraq, Iran, Libya, and North Korea to acquire, built or build, nuclear weapons.  All it really takes is a nation friendly to the terrorists and you too could have a nuclear explosion in your back yard.  And today there is no greater possibility for that nation to emerge, no more easily done, than that nation being Pakistan.
 

__________________________________________________________________________

AFI, a commercial organization, has a well deserved reputation for confronting major issues with both impartiality and total independence from Government and Corporate influence and with its US partners make up the AFI-Milnet-Orbat Intelligence network, offering one of  the leading international sources of expert information on the worlds conflicts, armed forces, intelligence, security services and related subjects.....contact us today to find out how we can help keep you better informed than your competition

Media Information

Senior Associate
Richard M Bennett (UK)

Associates
Dr Robert Zeidner (USA-Consultant), Michael Crawford (Milnet-USA), Ravi Rikhye (Orbat-USA),
Dr James Hawker (Australia-Consultant) and Ms Kate Bennett (UK)

International Network - US Partners
www.milnet.com/milnet/afi/
www.orbat.com (Armed Forces Intelligence)

Top Links
www.defense-i.com (Armed Forces Intelligence)    www.freelancedirectory.org (Bennett)
www.kimsoft.com/kim-spy.htm (AFI Research)   www.questico.co.uk/INSIGHT

This is the HTML version of the AFI Research international regular news feed. For those wishing to receive a text-only version contact afi@supanet.com

AFI is one of the best open sources of intelligence on the world's espionage and security services, international terrorism, armed forces, weapons and conflicts, that's why our releases are now one of the most widely used intelligence and conflict analysis news feeds.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AFI are pleased to announce a new review of some of the most important armies in world, 'FIGHTING FORCES', to be published on the 28th September by Barrons Educational Publishers of New York and written by Richard M. Bennett.

ISBN 0-7641-5343-9, priced at $29.95 with a 10% discount for orders placed on www.barronseduc.com in September.or call US Toll-free 1-800-645-3476, International  Tel: 631-434-3311 and Fax: 631-434-3217

AFI Research, The Ground Floor, 27 The Avenue, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ12 2BZ, UK tel/fax: +44(0)1626 33 50 40