MILNET Brief
 
Sudan Brief:  True Cooperation or Islamic Double Speak? (Updated 9/9)

"President Umar al-Bashir in an interview with Al-Arabiyah television maintained that the Sudanese Government could not expel HAMAS because it has a political relationship with the group and stated there was no PIJ [
Palestine Islamic Jihad] office in Sudan."

- Patterns of Global Terrorism, 2003, U.S. State Department, 2003
.

Like many islamic nations, Sudan maintains both a public face to western infidels, while at the same time continuing to go about their covert business as before.  And while the U.S. pushes diplomatically for changes, analysts (MILNET included) believe that Sudan is a long way from deserving the lifting of sanctions, and the U.S. is being naive to cite their new found cooperation as a rationale for lifting those sanctions.

Recent reports show that Sudan is allowing Islamist militiamen to kill and otherwise persecute other Muslim black farmers in the Darfur region.  Farmers in the region believe the Government is aiding their old friends and many analysts agree.  The Government denies the charges of course, and the same time, despite the declaration that a long North (Islamic), South (Christian/Pagan) civil war officially ended in May, outbreaks of violence continue to fester.  According to Power and Interest News Report -- PINR -- and the major media outlets, the situation is dire indeed:
"An expanding desert in the Darfur region, the result of an extended drought, pushed the region's Muslim Arab nomadic herders into greater contact with the Muslim black subsistence farmers and placed both groups in competition for increasingly limited natural resources. In early 2003, the farmers rebelled under the auspices of the Sudan Liberation Movement (S.L.M.) and Justice and Equality Movement (J.E.M.) against what they saw as the unjust treatment of the area's blacks under the Arabs, who they argue were being backed by the government in Khartoum (over fifty percent of the Sudanese military are Arabs from the Darfur region, which may help explain this perception).

Khartoum's response was to offer varying degrees of support to the Janjaweed militias that have fought to destroy the uprising of the Fur, Zagawa and Messalit tribes. The conflict has escalated to the point where over 10,000 people have been killed and over a million civilians have fled to refugee camps in Chad where U.S. officials estimate that at least 320,000 people will die from lack of food, clean water and medical attention."
 
On 9/9, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell spoke out about the current situation in the Darfur region:

"We concluded that genocide has been committed in Darfur and that the government of Sudan (search)  and the Janjaweed (Arab militias) bear responsibility -- and genocide may still be occurring"
Clearly the U.S. is losing patience with Sudan despite the government's recent attempts to court western approval.

To understand Sudan requires a short look at its recent history following its independence from the United Kingdom in 1956.


Sudan Backgrounder


Map of Sudan

The Flag of Sudan

Modern Sudan has not been a beacon of hope for Northeast Africa as this short paragraph from the CIA Factbook on Sudan illustrates:
"Military regimes favoring Islamic oriented governments have dominated national politics since independence from the UK in 1956. Sudan has been embroiled in a civil war for all but 10 years of this period (1972-82). The wars are rooted in northern economic, political, and social domination of non-Muslim, non-Arab southern Sudanese. Since 1983, the war and war- and famine-related effects have led to more than 2 million deaths and over 4 million people displaced. The ruling regime is a mixture of military elite and an Islamist party that came to power in a 1989 coup. Some northern opposition parties have made common cause with the southern rebels and entered the war as a part of an anti-government alliance. Peace talks gained momentum in 2002-03 with the signing of several accords, including a cease-fire agreement." 1
Like many northern African nations, Sudan enjoys a wealth of mineral export potentials, yet its people are the poorest in the world. Sudan also boasts of a $2.45 billion in exports, making it a rich nation compared to many in Africa.  Clearly, the problem is both developmental and governmental.  There are two classes in Sudan, haves and have nots, a pattern widespread throughout the continent.  And like many other African nations, they suffer from the standard desert like land problems, "inadequate supplies of potable water; wildlife populations threatened by excessive hunting; soil erosion; desertification; and periodic drought." 2

With over 39 million inhabitants and a national land size of some 2.5 million square kilometers, the nation is not exactly suffering from overpopulation according to land mass, yet all the conditions that one would see in an overpopulated nation are there, including starvation, pestilence, and tragically  rampant AIDS epidemic.

With Sudan spending nearly $600 million annually on their military, it is clear the nation fit a third world pattern that has not gone unnoticed.  Internal strife is the key issue, however with a north-south civil war producing millions of refugees constantly on the move toward neighboring countries, forcing Sudan's neighbors to bear much of the countries humanitarian burden.  Again, the CIA Factbook makes the international issues clear:
"the north-south civil war has affected Sudan's neighbors by drawing them into the fighting and by forcing them to provide shelter to refugees, to contend with infiltration by rebel groups, and to serve as mediators; Sudan has provided shelter to Ugandan refugees and cover to Lord's Resistance Army soldiers; Sudan accuses Eritrea of supporting Sudanese rebel groups; efforts to demarcate the porous boundary with Ethiopia have been delayed by fighting in Sudan; Kenya's administrative boundary still extends into the Sudan, creating the "Ilemi triangle"; Egypt and Sudan retain claims to administer the triangular areas that extend north and south of the 1899 Treaty boundary along the 22nd Parallel, but have withdrawn their military presence; Egypt is economically developing and currently effectively administers the "Hala'ib triangle" north of the Treaty Line; Sudan has pledged to work with the Central African Republic to stem violent skirmishes over water and grazing among related pastoral populations along the border.

...Sudan has turned around a struggling economy with sound economic policies and infrastructure investments, but it still faces formidable economic problems, starting from its low level of per capita output. From 1997 to date, Sudan has been implementing IMF macroeconomic reforms. In 1999, Sudan began exporting crude oil and in the last quarter of 1999 recorded its first trade surplus, which, along with monetary policy, has stabilized the exchange rate. Increased oil production, revived light industry, and expanded export processing zones helped sustain GDP growth at 6.1% in 2003. Agriculture production remains Sudan's most important sector, employing 80% of the work force and contributing 39% of GDP, but most farms remain rain-fed and susceptible to drought. Chronic instability - including the long-standing civil war between the Muslim north and the Christian/pagan south, adverse weather, and weak world agricultural prices - ensure that much of the population will remain at or below the poverty line for years.
" 2
Sudan is governed, not surprisingly due to its fit in the third world pattern, by a Junta which took power in 1989.  It's Islamic fundamentalist government is an alliance between the military and the National Congress Party -- NCP -- which was formerly called the National Islamic Front.  And yes, their roots are in terrorism, having grown to power by killing and torturing the infidels who resisted their climb to power.  The current President Ahmad Al-Bashir suspended the nations constitution in 1999.  Members of the president's cabinet are mostly members of the NCP.


Sudan as a State Sponsor of Terrorism

Sudan is listed as one of the top supporters of international terrorism, one of the last places where terrorists can openly go to train.  It has been on the U.S. list of nations sponsoring terrorism and has every sanction levied against possible. 

According to Thomas Hayden, a well known terrorism expert, terrorism is a tactic as part of insurgency, and his definition is:
"Insurgency is an organized movement aimed at the overthrow or destabilization of a constituted government through subversion, terrorism and armed conflict." 4
Hayden cites a wealth of data on Usama Bin Laden's fleeing to Sudan after being expelled and stripped of his Saudi citizenship.  Why Sudan?  Just like Afghanistan, UBL found like minded leadership in Sudan, and Al Qaeda's roots began there and then moved into Afghanistan to take advantage of the Mujadeen nationalism and Taliban rule.

The U.S. State Department currently designates seven world governments as state sponsors of terrorism. Though most no longer engage directly in terrorist activity themselves, they may support terrorist groups by providing funding, arms, or other material support; or by providing training, logistical support, sanctuary, or diplomatic facilities. 3 

The nations listed prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria.

On Sudan's part, their place on the list comes from a series of actions up through the U.S. Clintion Administration.  According to an online data source, the U.S. government's stance on Sudan is:
"Though it has taken some positive steps to curb terrorism (including the ejection from its territory of terrorist financier Usama bin Laden), the Sudan remains in violation of UN Security Council resolutions that demand the surrender of three suspects in the 1995 assassination attempt against Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Sudan also allows known terrorists to use its territory for sanctuary and training.
In August, U.S. cruise missiles destroyed a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory suspected of producing the precursors to VX nerve gas.
Affiliated Groups: Lebanese Hezbollah, PIJ, ANO, Hamas
Sanctions: US bans all exports to and imports from, as well as US investment in, Sudan." 3
Note that the Sudanese government is suspected of contributing to ongoing operations and training of the Lebanese Hezbollah as well as world infamous Hamas, organizations responsible for more than 85% of all terrorist activity before Al Qaeda began its push in the last decade.


Human Rights Issues

Interestingly, Sudan has their own internal terrorist problem, or so they protest.  The Darfur region's farmers have formed two groups that the government claims are terrorists, the Sudan Liberation Movement (S.L.M.) and Justice and Equality Movement (J.E.M.).  However, there is no independent confirmation of either of the groups organizing or condoning violence against the government, rather, the two groups are politically active and extremely vocal.

In nearby Chad, aid workers face depressing conditions as access to those inside the Sudanese border has been limited, even after numerous nations in the African Union stepped up their support and the the legally binding ending of the civil war in May. 

PINR claims that the Afghanistan and Iraqi military commitments  "have marginalized Washington's role in protecting the global capitalist system." 1

The implication is that the usual support for a  political solution lacks enthusiasm due to the lack of military clout behind  the State Department's efforts.  However, MILNET believes the rationale is much different.  Sudan has paid much lip service to changing their ways, yet little has been done for decades and the situation in Darfur is a ready illustration of how the government cares little for its minorities, human rights.  Again, PINR does get one thing right, the only thing working in favor of Sudan is their expelling Usama Bin Laden some years back.  Of course that particular episode also shows a true lack of cooperation, with the new U.S new "friendship" falling down when Usama easily made it to Afghanistan without being intercepted.

Another thing that PINR gets right, is that the U.N. is pretty powerless and useless, especially in the case of Sudan, where bickering among delegates and a security council focused on other matters means for several decades, Sudan has been unscathed by U.N. lip service to human rights and anti-terrorism efforts.  The organization has suffered staff losses in Sudan, which makes it difficult for them to consider a continued presence in the country.  In fact, the 5000 member U.N. worker's union has formally requested better protection citing the Sudan staff deaths as indicative of the terrorist threat against them. 6


Weapons of Mass Destruction

In terms of WMD, the Department of Defense, in its 2001 analysis of Sudan's chemical program stated
"Sudan has been interested in acquiring a chemical weapons warfare capability since the 1980s and has sought assistance from a number of countries with chemical warfare programs. We believe that Iraq, in particular, as provided technical assistance to Khartoum.  In addition, the finding of a known VX precursor chemical near a pharmaceutical facility in Khartoum suggests that Sudan may be pursuing a more advanced chemical warfare capability.  Sudan acceded to the CWC in 1999, although allegations of Sudanese chemical warfare use against rebels in Southern Sudan have persisted.  These and prior allegations of chemical warfare use, have not been confirmed.  Further, Khartoum's desire to present a more moderate image and alleviate its international isolation will cause Sudan to proceed with its chemical warfare program with caution." 5
MILNET believes that Sudan's chemical program present more than the usual chemical warfare threat to the region and its internal foes, but that their long time ties with terrorism could make them an equal threat to proliferation of chemical weapons to Al Qaeda or even dissenting terrorist groups active in Iraq prior to the new Iraqi elections in late 2004.

Another alarming situation visa-vis Usama Bin Laden is the case where U.S. Prosecutors claimed in a German hearing that UBL tried to contract with Sudan to build a nuclear weapon, citing UBL as the money man and the Sudanese scientific community as the builder.  This report, widely disputed, appeared in the Washington Post in September of  1998.   If true, it would be the first public clue of the Sudanese working on a nuclear program.  Our intelligence sources shrug, however, so either the news is false, or the reality is so highly classified no one is willing to talk about it.


The Beginning of the Current Rapprochement

In fact in October of 2000, less than a year before the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and the Pentagon, the U.S. prevented Sudan form gaining a seat on the U.N. Security Council.  U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Richard Holbrooke declared that Sudan continued to be a state sponsor of terrorism and therefore should not have a seat.

As early as 2001, however, the U.S. has modified its stance on Sudan somewhat.  Despite no guarantees, the U.S. (Both Clinton and Bush administrations) have hoped that dialog has meant the country would continue to disassociate itself from terrorist groups.  In October of 2001, as the angry U.S. diplomats were putting pressure on any nation associated with Al Qaeda, reports were that the U.S. was privately demanding Sudan to roundup terrorists of all sorts and close camps. 

In 2003, however, the U.S. capped a three year long effort to reward Sudan for changes in policies and its cooperation by stating in the annual report Patterns of Global Terrorism:

"The Sudanese Government also took steps in 2003 to strengthen its legislative and bureaucratic instruments for fighting terrorism by ratifying the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. Sudan also ratified the African Union's Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism and the Convention of the Organization of the Islamic Conference on Combating Terrorism. In June, Sudanese Minister of Justice Ali Mohamed Osman Yassin issued a decree establishing an office for combating terrorism. In 2003, Sudan signed a counterterrorism cooperation agreement with the Algerian Government, which during the 1990s accused Sudan of harboring wanted Algerian terrorists. Sudan also signed a counterterrorism agreement with Yemen and Ethiopia." 8
Unfortunately, our intelligence sources say that while some improvements have been made, the country remains a terrorist training ground, and that U.S. officials are running out of patience.  Indeed the Darfur situation may convince those hoping diplomacy has won in Sudan, to finally admit that like many Middle Eastern countries, the North African Sudanese are saying one thing in public and doing the opposite in actuality.  It could very well mean the U.S. will have to divert precious military resources to forcing Sudan to changes its policies.  Timing of course will be critical, as many also admit that the U.S. is unable to field another force in the world without some major "give and take" elsewhere.

With U.S. reserve forces already facing angry reservists and their employers back home, it is sufficiently logical to assume that this is not something the U.S. government wants to consider.  However, as time moves on, Sudan becomes more of a threat, not less.  Its failure to stop terrorist training altogether and its human rights conditions keep in high on the sanctions list in the U.S. 

Some analysts believe that if the Darfur situation is resolved by Khartoum in the next three to six months, that the U.S. will once again begin pushing for easing of sanctions, hoping again for improved cooperation and a final shutdown of all terrorist training and expulsion of all terrorist groups from the country -- beginning with Hamas and the Palestine Islamic Jihad.



Sources:
  1. Resolving the Crisis in Darfur in the New Global Security Environment, Power and Interest News Report, 8/2/2004
  2. CIA World Factbook, 11 May 2004.
  3. State Sponsored Terrorism, Infoplease, Ben Snowden and Laura Hayes, undated
  4. H. Thomas Hayden:  Terrorism Speech to Rotary, Military.com, July 18, 2003
  5. Non-Proliferation: Threat and Response, U.S. Department of Defense, January 2001 (MILNET mirror)
  6. U.N. Headquarters Staff Demand More Security, Inter Press Service News Agency, Thalif Deen, 8/3/2004
  7. White House Mulls U.N. Action on Sudan; U.S. Concludes Country Has Ended Its Support For Terrorist Group, Colum Lynch, Washington Post, 8/21/2001 (link may fail, complain to Wash. Post!)
  8. Patterns of Global Terrorism 2003: Overview of State-Sponsored Terrorism,  U.S. State Department, April 29, 2004
  9. Powell:  Sudan Atrocities are Genocide, Fox News/A.P., 9/9/2004




+
-  Copyright ©, 2004, Michael G. Crawford for MILNET