DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY AREA PLAN DTOs
AIR PLATFORMS

AP.01.00 Advanced Aerodynamic Concepts for Increased Flight Efficiency. This DTO demonstrates affordable aerodynamic technologies that provide increased cruise efficiency and reduced weight over current fixed-wing aircraft technology, yielding increased range and payload both with and without external weapons.

The overall objectives are to demonstrate, by FY02, a 10% increase in cruise lift/drag, a 25% reduction in nozzle weight, a 35% reduction in inlet/duct weight, contributing to the goal of a 20% reduction in airframe weight; and a 25% reduction in nozzle cost, contributing to a 20% reduction in aircraft production costs and a 20% reduction in operation and support costs.

In FY97, the program will demonstrate performance of compact inlets with minimum boundary layer control for reduced inlet/duct weight. In FY98, it will demonstrate a multipoint tailless fighter configuration with a higher aspect ratio lambda wing to increase cruise lift-to-drag ratio. Powered lift for airlift/patrol/bomber configurations will be demonstrated to increase landing lift coefficient and reduce takeoff distance in FY99. In FY00 the program will demonstrate a low drag LO weapons pod at transonic and supersonic speeds to minimize the effect of external weapons carriage on cruise efficiency. A reduced weight, structurally integrated fixed area thrust vectoring nozzle for cruise-efficient fighter/attack aircraft will be demonstrated in FY01. In FY02, the program will demonstrate reduced weight and volume of a high-performance, full-scale compact, fixed-geometry inlet for cruise efficient fighter/attack aircraft. Demonstration of these technology advancements will contribute to a 25% increase in range/payload and a 10% reduction in takeoff gross weight.

Technology barriers to overcome for increased cruise efficiency are the weight of the higher aspect ratio wings, controlling and minimizing localized separated flow, and integrating a high-lift system into a thin wing. Barriers to achieving low aircraft drag while carrying external weapons in a low-drag weapons pod are weight, acoustic, and store separation environments. Barriers to achieving a reduced weight thrust vectoring nozzle with full area control include response rates, controllability, airflow requirements, and load sharing with cold airframe structure. Barriers to achieving lightweight compact inlets include reducing duct length with minimal total pressure loss, acceptable boundary layer control while maintaining stability and total pressure recovery, and maintaining high performance above Mach 1.5.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602201F24045.54.85.56.25.0 00
0603245F25681.41.92.80.91.400
0602122N


1.01.30.81.21.3 0 0
Total7.98.09.18.37.700

AP.02.00 Fixed-Wing Vehicle Structures Technology. This DTO addresses a subset of the fixed-wing vehicle subarea goals: production cost, EMD cost, and airframe weight. This DTO demonstrates structural performance improvements resulting from reduced weight and cost, leading to a 30% reduction in manufacturing cost for fighter/attack airframe and a 20% fighter weight reduction by FY00.

Specific technology objectives include, in FY97, a ground test of a conformal load-bearing antenna structure for 50% lower installation cost and 50% less weight; in FY00, a composite primary structural demonstration for a 30% structural weight reduction and 20% reduced fabrication costs; in FY02, a manned flight demonstration of active aeroelastic wing, for a 10% structural weight reduction; and in FY08, a demonstration of virtual prototyping for a 50% reduction in development time. These technologies will directly contribute to attainment of system payoffs of 10% in reduced life-cycle cost, a 25% increase in mission range or payload, a 15% reduction in susceptibility and a 10% reduction in takeoff gross weight.

Existing development times and costs are too high because of the need for extensive sub-element design and hardware testing. Virtual prototyping and interdisciplinary design and analysis are required to significantly cut the time and cost to reach EMD. Current analytical codes are unable to predict structural responses to twin-tail buffet and weapon bay acoustic excitation. The application of higher percentages of composites in future flight vehicles is critically dependent upon reducing the cost of design, layup, manufacturing, and assembly of advanced composites. Active aeroelastic wings require the synthesis of three-dimensional structural properties, modified aerodynamic properties, and modified control systems for improved maneuverability. Conformal antennas to reduce drag and improve radar and communication performance require the combination of load-bearing structures with the antenna electromagnetic characteristics.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602201F24017.78.710.19.511.313.615.0
0603211F486U5.46.67.75.12.45.23.4
0602212N


0.51.21.01.31.01.01.0
Total13.616.418.815.914.719.719.4

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

AP.03.00 Aircraft Support/Sustainment Reduction. This DTO will develop, demonstrate, and transition technologies to extend the lives or reduce the costs of aging aircraft. The four technology areas are corrosion/fatigue, widespread fatigue damage (WFD), repairs, and dynamics. Corrosion/fatigue and WFD advances will improve the life assessment of aircraft structures with multisite damage (MSD) and corrosion present. Metrics and transformations accounting for corrosion and MSD will be developed and demonstrated and transitioned to the air logistics centers (ALCs). Probabilistic analysis will be the primary focus of these efforts, due to the numerous parameters involved. Applications of damage-tolerant bonded repairs will be developed and demonstrated. A design tool for use by ALC engineers to quickly and confidently design patch repairs will be transitioned to operational use. Improved prediction and control of damaging dynamic loads will increase fatigue life and reduce support costs. The ability to predict the effects of unsteady aerodynamic loads will be developed and used with advanced structural concepts to increase fatigue life and reduce the support cost of aircraft.

The results of these technology advances will provide a 20% increase in fatigue life and a 20% reduction in support costs during Phase 1 (FY00); a 30% increase in fatigue life and a 30% reduction in support costs in Phase 2 (FY05); and a 40% increase in fatigue life and a 40% reduction in support costs in Phase 3 (FY10). Specific technology demonstrations include, in FY98, a preferred spare for a high-performance-aircraft wing spar; in FY00, life assessment, including corrosion effects; in FY02, life assessment, including WFD effects; in FY03, validated, bonded repair design tool; and, in FY06, validated airframe system life enhancement techniques. These results will constitute a significant part of the system-level payoffs of 10% reduction in operations and support costs and 10% increase in operational readiness.

There is currently no means for predicting the response of aircraft structures to degradation due to corrosion, multisite damage, or unsteady aerodynamics. The highly complex nature of corrosion chemistry and the random nature of fatigue cracks are further complicated by a shortfall in nondestructive inspection techniques to detect these forms of damage. Codes to model the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft are unable to predict structural response.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Bill King
ONR 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602201F24018.08.07.99.07.65.54.6
0603211F486U3.76.26.611.513.111.814.2
Total11.714.214.520.520.817.318.8

AP.04.00 Flight Control Technology for Affordable Global Reach/Power. This DTO develops flight control technologies leading to affordable aircraft control systems that automatically adjust to and survive combat damage; have on-board systems to identify flight control component failures to reduce repair time; provide supersonic tailless fighter control to improve range/payload; have power-by-wire/fly-by-light control technology to improve reliability; have LO air data systems to improve survivability; and operate in poor visibility with an autonomous landing system to increase operational readiness. The program will develop the following technologies: 15 horsepower electric actuation; LO air data system yielding 25% reduced life-cycle cost; photonic vehicle management systems with 20 times faster throughput; battle-damaged tolerant/reconfigurable flight control systems; lower observable aerodynamic controls effectors; and weather-piercing visual flight system for 75% lower decision height. FY97 activities will produce an autonomous landing guidance flight demonstration, an innovative control effector wind tunnel test, and a fighter aileron electric actuator flight demonstration. In FY98, the program will undertake a fly-by-light component flight test. In FY99, laboratory demonstration of optical air data components will be completed. FY00 activities will produce a reconfigurable control tailless aircraft simulation demonstration, and, in FY01, the program will flight demonstrate a fighter high-horsepower stabilator electric actuator.

Development of this technology will, by FY02, contribute to the reduction of fighter/attack aircraft operation and support costs by 20%, increase range by 25%, reduce radar signature, and improve lethality. For large aircraft, the program will, by FY02, contribute to total elimination of aircraft hydraulics, enable landing without ground-based navigation aids into Cat III conditions, and contribute to a 20% increase in range or payload.

Technology barriers include the inability to generate directional aerodynamic control power for tailless aircraft; identify on-line aerodynamic model and control law changes needed to compensate for battle-damaged or failed control surfaces; package high-horsepower electric actuation within aircraft mold lines; field affordable, low-observable air data systems for highly dynamic flight vehicles; and field reliable photonic connectors, backplane, and electro-optic conversion components for fly-by-light.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602201F24038.611.911.111.511.712.012.4
0603205F29780.3 1.82.22.62.61.60.5
0603245F2568001.11.12.12.44.6
0602122N


0.81.51.61.51.61.71.7
Total9.715.216.016.718.017.719.2

AP.05.00 Maturity Demonstration of Advanced Air Platform Technologies. This DTO validates advanced technologies in a realistic operational environment. The F-15 MANX thrust-vectored tailless aircraft will integrate flight and propulsion control. Fly-by-light (FBL) technology for fighter aircraft using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) will demonstrate fiber optics as the flight control signal carrier. Reconfigurable control for tailless aircraft (RCTA) will demonstrate real-time parameter identification and control law design. Advanced aeroelastic wing (AAW) will demonstrate integration of flexible structures and flight control. These technologies will be demonstrated on the Future Aircraft Technology Enhancement (FATE) vehicle.

Specific activities include a MANX flight test in FY98, a FBL COTS flight test in FY99, an AAW flight test FY99, and an RCTA flight test in FY01. The FATE vehicle (an uninhabited scaled technology demonstration) will be flight tested from FY01 through FY03. Based on contractor studies, MANX is predicted to produce a 13% improvement in range and a 15-20% reduction in peacetime loss rate due to spin prevention and departure recovery. Reduced support cost, signature reduction, and increased agility are still being assessed. FBL COTS will reduce life-cycle cost. RCTA is projected to reduce flight control development cost by 10%. AAW has a projected savings of 10% of the wing weight of the flight test vehicle. The predicted new aircraft design weight savings for a subsonic fighter is 10%, and 20% for a supersonic fighter. AAW will enable weight-competitive higher aspect ratio wings and smaller control surface deflection ((5 deg maximum). FATE is projected to save 50% in production cost for an all-composite airframe and 20% on life-cycle cost, increase cruise lift/drag 20%, and reduce weight by 20%. Technologies integrated in this program will contribute to a 10% reduction in system life-cycle cost, a 25% increase in range or payload, and a 10% reduction in takeoff gross weight.

MANX technology barriers include integrating flight and propulsion control, developing sufficient control power at supersonic speeds, and reliability with failure mode accommodation. The FBL COTS challenge is to maintain flight safety and reliability requirements. RCTA is tackling real-time parameter identification and control law design. The integration of flight control and structural strength technology is the challenge to AAW. The FATE technology barrier is the integration of technologies to produce cost and performance benefits greater than the sum of the individual technologies.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Ryan S. Dow
HQ AMC/XP
(618) 256-4671
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109
Mr. Rich Trenck
APEO (A)
(703) 604-3910 x6026

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602201F24040.70.70.60000
0603205F2978000.62.12.43.35.3
0603211F486U0.82.23.40000
0603245F25681.22.12.22.12.90.92.4
Total2.75.06.84.25.34.27.7

AP.06.00 Helicopter Active Control Technology. This DTO will demonstrate rotary-wing flight control technologies leading to, by FY02, a 50% reduction in the probability of encountering degraded handling qualities due to flight control system failures; a 60% improvement in weapons pointing accuracy; a 10% increase in agility and maneuverability; and a 30% reduction in flight control system flight test time compared to current technology through simulation and flight test of second-generation digital fly-by-light control systems, integrated fire/fuel/flight control, robust control law design methods, and fault tolerant architectures. The FY99 goal is to complete hardware and software preliminary design. By FY00, the program will fabricate hardware and conduct software V&V. By FY02, the program will install the system and conduct ground and flight tests.

The HACT DTO will demonstrate capability improvements to all-weather/night mission performance, flight safety, and development time/cost that contribute to a 4% reduction in RDT&E costs, a 30% increase in maneuverability/agility, and a 30% reduction in major accident rate. These improvements will contribute to system-level payoffs in reducing development and operation and support costs.

The program will integrate state-of-the-art rotorcraft flight control technologies and exploit developments in fixed-wing hardware components and architecture to overcome barriers such as the lack of knowledge of optimal rotorcraft response types; techniques for sensing the onset of limits and cueing the pilot; inadequate air vehicle math modeling and flight control system design, optimization, and validation techniques; and lack of knowledge in the optimum functional integration of flight control, weapon systems, and pilot interface.

Service/Agency POCService/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Robert Kennedy
HQ USAATCOM
(314) 263-1441
Mr. Jeffrey Smith
DARPA-TTO
(703) 696-2305
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Ted Hundley
USA Aviation Center
(205) 255-2704
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0603003AD31300.53.210.09.06.30
Total00.53.210.09.06.30

AP.07.00 Demonstration of Advanced Rotor Concepts. This DTO will demonstrate aeromechanics technologies leading to, by FY04, an increase in maximum blade loading of 25%, an increase in rotor aerodynamic efficiency of 10%, a reduction in aircraft loads and vibration loads of 53%, and a reduction in acoustic radiation of 7 dB over current technology via advanced concept evaluation and application in enabling technology and applied technology efforts. By FY98, model-scale, active on-blade active control rotor concepts will be demonstrated for reducing vibration and noise. By FY00, concepts toward the elimination of conventional rotor lag dampers through the application of smart structures and rotorcraft analysis methodology improvements will be demonstrated. By FY02, the program will fabricate an advanced active control rotor for wind tunnel testing.

These demonstrations contribute to rotary-wing vehicle system level payoffs for FY05 of a 136% increase in range or 98% increase in payload, a 15% increase in cruise speed, a 50% increase in maneuverability/agility, a 45% increase in reliability, and a 10% reduction in operation and support costs for fielded and new systems. Achieving these objectives will be accomplished by executing a set of programs and demonstrations to substantially increase the prediction effectiveness of rotorcraft analysis methodology and to overcome barriers such as the accurate prediction and control of stall, drag, and compressibility characteristics; actuators constructed using smart materials for primary control and vibration control; and understanding and modeling the effects of critical airwakes on the dynamics of rotorcraft.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Robert Kennedy
HQ USAATCOM
(314) 263-1441
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Ted Hundley
USA Aviation Center
(205) 255-2704
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602211AA47A3.23.43.53.4000
0603003AD31300003.09.522.9
Total3.23.43.53.43.09.522.9

AP.08.00 Fighter/Attack/Strike Propulsion. Technology demonstrations for the Integrated High-Performance Turbine Engine Technology Program are divided into the three fundamental classes of gas turbine engines: man-rated turbofan/turbojet engines for fighter/ attack/strike applications; man-rated turboshaft/turboprop engines for transport/patrol/helicopter applications; and expendable engines for cruise missile applications. For fighter/attack/strike propulsion, the goals are to demonstrate, by FY97, a 60% increase in thrust/weight ratio, a 200°F increase in combustor inlet temperature, and a 20% decrease in acquisition and maintenance costs from the 1987 state of the art, via core demonstrations in the Advanced Turbine Engine Gas Generator effort and full engine demonstrations in the Joint Technology Demonstrator Engine effort. By FY03, the program will demonstrate a 100% increase in thrust/weight ratio, a 400°F increase in combustor inlet temperature, and a 35% reduction in acquisition and maintenance costs.

Payoffs for achieving the fighter/attack/strike goals include increased aircraft payload by 50%, increased mission radius by 115%, or reduced takeoff weight for new aircraft by 35%. All of these payoffs lead to improved aircraft affordability (system capability/system cost)-the first two via enhanced capability and the latter through reduced cost.

The technology barriers for doubling propulsion system capability are well known. Higher temperatures at combustion initiation are required to decrease fuel consumption (via increased compression system pressure ratio) or increase maximum flight speed, thereby expanding the flight envelope; higher maximum temperatures are required to increase the output per unit airflow (specific thrust); less weight per unit airflow is required to increase the output per unit weight (thrust/weight or power/weight ratio); and all of the preceding advances must be accomplished while maintaining or increasing component efficiencies, durability, and life and while reducing cost. Specific technology development areas include application of advanced materials that exhibit higher temperature capability and lower density; improved aerothermodynamic design capability for improved component efficiencies and control of heat transfer; innovative structural concepts for part count reduction and improved durability; and compatibility of these developments with lower cost manufacturing processes.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Charles Gorton
NAVAIR-4.4T
(301) 342-7850 x167
Mr. Olen Sisson
APEO (T)
(703) 604-3900 x5929

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602203F306632.634.935.536.837.438.839.9
0603202F668A23.225.626.527.428.629.030.0
0603216F681B28.331.032.233.335.035.136.0
0602122N


4.55.26.16.16.16.16.1
0603217NW20145.76.44.73.03.13.33.5
Total94.3103.0105.0106.6110.2112.3115.5

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

AP.09.00 Transport/Patrol/Helicopter Propulsion. Technology demonstrations for the Integrated High-Performance Turbine Engine Technology Program are divided into the three fundamental classes of gas turbine engines: man-rated turbofan/turbojet engines for fighter/ attack/strike applications; man-rated turboshaft/turboprop engines for transport/patrol/helicopter applications; and expendable engines for cruise missile applications. For transport/ patrol/helicopter propulsion, the goals are to demonstrate, by FY97, a 30% reduction in specific fuel consumption, an 80% increase in power/weight ratio, and a 20% decrease in acquisition and maintenance costs from the 1987 state of the art via demonstrations in the Joint Turbine Advanced Gas Generator effort. By FY03, the program will demonstrate a 40% reduction in specific fuel consumption, a 120% increase in power/weight ratio, and a 35% decrease in acquisition and maintenance costs.

Payoffs for achieving the transport/patrol/helicopter goals include a 200% increase in time-on-station for patrol/surveillance aircraft; payload increased by over 33% and fuel consumption reduced by over 50% for equivalent CH-47D mission; or mission radius increased by 40% with double personnel payload for UH-60L helicopter. All of these payoffs lead to improved aircraft affordability (system capability/system cost).

The technology barriers for doubling propulsion system capability are well known. Higher temperatures at combustion initiation are required to decrease fuel consumption (via increased compression system pressure ratio) or increase maximum flight speed thereby expanding the flight envelope; higher maximum temperatures are required to increase the output per unit airflow (specific thrust); less weight per unit airflow is required to increase the output per unit weight (thrust/weight or power/weight ratio); and all of the preceding advances must be accomplished while maintaining or increasing component efficiencies, durability, and life and while reducing cost. Specific technology development areas include advanced materials that exhibit higher temperature capability and lower density; improved aerothermodynamic design capability for improved component efficiencies and control of heat transfer; innovative structural concepts for part count reduction and improved durability; and compatibility of these developments with lower cost manufacturing processes. Other technology barriers include control of cooling air in small blades and vanes, centrifugal impeller aerodynamics, and operation at higher rotor speeds.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Ryan S. Row
HQ AMC/XPQ
(618) 256-2919
Mr. Charles Gorton
NAVAIR-4.4T
(301) 342-7850 x167
Mr. Rich Trenck
APEO (A)
(703) 604-3910 x6026
Mr. Henry Morrow
AATD AMSAT-R-TP
(804) 878-4130
Mr. Paul Bogosian
SFAE-AV
(314) 263-7429

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602203F30662.32.42.42.42.52.62.7
0603216F681B1.60.72.02.02.02.02.0
0602122N


0.70.91.01.01.01.01.0
0603217NW20140.70.62.02.92.92.92.9
0602211AA47A/
A47B
2.22.22.32.32.52.52.5
0603003AD4477.86.66.67.27.17.07.1
Total15.313.416.317.817.918.018.2

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

AP.10.00 Cruise Missile/Expendable Propulsion. Technology demonstrations for the Integrated High-Performance Turbine Engine Technology Program are divided into the three fundamental classes of gas turbine engines: man-rated turbofan/turbojet engines for fighter/ attack/strike applications; man-rated turboshaft/turboprop engines for transport/patrol/helicopter applications; and expendable engines for cruise missile applications. For cruise missile/ expendable propulsion, the goals are to demonstrate, by FY97, a 70% increase in thrust/airflow, a 30% reduction in specific fuel consumption, and a 45% acquisition cost reduction from the 1987 state of the art, via demonstrations in the Joint Expendable Turbine Engine Concept effort. By FY03, the program will demonstrate a 40% reduction in specific fuel consumption, a 100% increase in thrust per unit airflow, and a 60% reduction in cost.

Payoffs for achieving the cruise missile/expendable propulsion goals include supersonic cruise missiles with a 200% range increase over a rocket, a 30% payload increase enabling an intercontinental range ALCM-sized missile, and over 100% increase in loiter time for unmanned air vehicles (UAVs). All of these payoffs lead to improved aircraft affordability (system capability/system cost).

The technology barriers for doubling propulsion system capability are well known. Higher temperatures at combustion initiation are required to decrease fuel consumption (via increased compression system pressure ratio) or increase maximum flight speed thereby expanding the flight envelope; higher maximum temperatures are required to increase the output per unit airflow (specific thrust); less weight per unit airflow is required to increase the output per unit weight (thrust/weight or power/weight ratio); and all of the preceding advances must be accomplished while maintaining or increasing component efficiencies, durability, and life and while reducing cost. Specific technology development areas include application of advanced materials that exhibit higher temperature capability and lower density; improved aerothermodynamic design capability for improved component efficiencies and control of heat transfer; innovative structural concepts for part count reduction and improved durability; and compatibility of these developments with lower cost manufacturing processes. Technologies unique to expendable propulsion include limited life design criteria, long shelf-life requirements without maintenance, and instrumentation of extremely small components.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Charles Gorton
NAVAIR-4.4T
(301) 342-7850 x167
Mr. Joseph Bonaiuto
APEO (CU)
(703) 604-4110 x5841

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602203F30663.13.33.53.63.63.73.8
0603202F668A3.85.05.05.05.05.05.0
0602122N


0.30.40.50.50.50.50.5
0603217NW20140.70.61.02.02.02.02.0
Total8.09.39.911.111.011.211.3

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

AP.11.00 Aircraft Power (MEA). By FY98, under the More Electric Aircraft (MEA) initiative, this DTO will demonstrate the ability to eliminate the need for a central hydraulic system through electric power, demonstrating a tenfold increase in aircraft electrical system reliability and a 100% increase in power system fault tolerance. By FY05, the program will demonstrate a twofold increase in integrated power unit densities, environmentally safe 28-Vdc batteries, high-power density 270-Vdc batteries (less than 1 kW/kg), no airframe-mounted gearbox, a twentyfold increase in power system reliability, and a 200% increase in power system fault tolerance for electric flight control and brake actuation systems.

Aircraft and system-level payoffs for the power technology improvements demonstrated in this DTO include a 20% reduction in deployment requirements for combat aircraft due to reduced ground support equipment; a 15% reduction in maintenance manpower; two-level maintenance instead of three-level; a 15% increase in sortie generation rate; an 8-9% reduction in combat aircraft life-cycle cost, and an 8% reduction in takeoff ground weight for a Joint Strike Fighter-type platform; a fourfold increase in power system reliability for an F-16 platform; and a 15% reduction in vulnerability for combat aircraft.

Major MEA challenges come from both technology and programmatic hurdles. Technical barriers are addressed by four technical efforts: power generation (generator high-temperature, high-strength magnetic materials, electronics life and high-temperature tolerance, cooling, rugged design, turbo-electric machinery integration, power unit rotor dynamics); power distribution (thermal management and passive cooling techniques, fault sensing/switching/ reconfigure times, solid-state device leakage currents and "on"-resistance, high-quality silicon carbide material, diode operation temperatures and speed, capacitor scaleability); energy storage (lightweight materials in batteries, charge control under uncontrolled temperatures, high-energy cathode materials, low-temperature operation and lithium anode rechargeability); and systems integration (current/voltage tolerances, minimizing electromagnetic interference, minimum weight/volume redundancy, optimize thermal management, system integration to meet form/fit/ function and power density for user, system-level implications of high-power use). The main programmatic challenge is to identify and actively pursue the best retrofit and life-cycle cost improvement opportunities within budgetary constraints.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Fred Schwartz
ZSF
(703) 602-7390 x6637
Mr. Charles Gorton
NAVAIR-4.4T
(301) 342-7850 x167
Col Ryan S. Dow
HQ AMC/XPQ
(618) 256-2919

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602203F314514.215.114.915.016.316.617.1
0603216F30352.6 3.73.53.94.14.34.5
0602122N


0.71.01.01.31.41.21.2
Total17.519.819.420.321.822.122.8

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

AP.12.00 Rotorcraft Drive. By FY00, this DTO will demonstrate a 25% increase in power-to-weight and a 10-dB reduction in drive-system-generated noise. Along with these goals, the demonstration will validate the application of advanced materials and a design methodology that will double the mean time between removal (MTBR) of the drive system.

Rotorcraft drive systems payoffs resulting from this DTO include a 15% increase in range or a 25% payload increase for an AH-64 antiarmor mission, as well as a 50% reduction in drive system maintenance man-hour per flight hour and an 8-10% reduction in total aircraft operating cost per flight hour. Drive system source noise reduction translates directly into increased crew/pilot endurance and efficiency in the short term, and reduced hearing loss in the long term.

Technical barriers associated with achievement of the weight and noise goals and the doubling of MTBR involve (1) developing very compact, durable high-reduction ratio gear configurations with over 99.5% efficiency (minimal relative surface sliding) and extremely low vibration and noise characteristics (low kinematic error); (2) maintaining drive system component durability while utilizing a reduced weight/volume high-temperature lubrication system; (3) the application of advanced steel alloys and coatings with high-temperature fracture toughness, bending fatigue strength, and surface durability of gears and bearings; (4) the application of lightweight, affordable, corrosion-resistant housing materials that maintain strength at elevated temperatures; and (5) developing lightweight, low-speed/high-load capacity bearings with extreme durability while operating in a poor lubrication environment.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Thomas House
ATCOM/AMSAT-R-Z
(314) 263-1012
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Rich Trenck
APEO (A)
(703) 604-3910 x6026
Mr. Henry Morrow
ATCOM/AMSAT-R-TP
(757) 878-4130
Mr. Paul Bogosian
SFAE-AV
(314) 263-7429

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602211AA47A/
A47B
0.40.50.50.5000
0603003AD3132.04.09.07.0000
Total2.44.59.57.5000

AP.13.00 Affordable/Supportable Fixed-Wing Vehicle Subsystems Technology. This DTO will develop technologies that decrease aircraft weight, increase mission range, and enhance survivability and safety. Reduced manufacturing cost and O&S costs and improved reliability, maintainability, and supportability are an integral part of this DTO. Advanced manufacturing technologies are focused on reducing parts count and simplifying production processes. Low-pressure injection molding of aircraft components, such as windshields, canopies, radomes, and sensor windows, will reduce manufacturing costs up to 50% and parts counts up to 90%. Advanced modeling and simulation will reduce design cycle times up to 25% by developing a system-based tradeoff capability of vehicle components, subsystems, and stores. Application of advanced materials and heat transfer processes, such as electrohydrodynamic heat transfer, will reduce component weight and volume up to 10%. Application of advanced materials to landing gear systems will reduce landing gear weight up to 25% and reduce support costs up to 40%. Attainment of these technology objectives will contribute to the following fixed-wing vehicle (FWV) subarea goals; a 20% reduction in production at T-1; a 20% reduction in operating and support costs; a 20% reduction in engineering manufacturing development cost; and a 20% reduction in airframe weight. In FY97, the program will provide a ground demonstration of lightweight, corrosion-resistant TMC landing gear components. FY98 activities will result in the final ground demonstration of long-life tires for fighters, and flight demonstration of an advanced-computed-air-release-point algorithm to increase payload delivery accuracy. In FY99, the program will produce a flight demonstration of an injection-molded frameless windshield. FY00 activities will develop a FWV subsystems virtual engineering methodology. In FY01, the program will demonstrate a cargo trajectory simulation model to increase payload delivery accuracy. These technologies will contribute to a fighter/attack system range increase of 25%, 10% decrease in life-cycle costs, reduced susceptibility, and 10% increase in operational readiness. Similar payoffs will result for large aircraft.

Technology barriers include control of the low-pressure injection molding process applied to large transparencies; developing advanced tire compounds and designs for small, highly loaded fighter aircraft tires; manufacturing large/complex TMC components; and developing mathematical models of complex physical processes for realistic modeling and simulation.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. G. Keith Richey
WL/FI
(513) 255-3900
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325
Mr. Bill King
ONR 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0603211F240200.20.20000
0602201F24023.85.66.75.63.73.83.9
0603205F29784.81.90.600.30.70.2
Total8.67.77.55.64.04.54.1

AP.14.00 Rotary-Wing Structures Technology. This DTO will demonstrate structures technologies leading to, by FY01, a 15% increase in structural efficiency, improve structural loads prediction accuracy to 75%, and reduce costs by 25% without adversely impacting airframe signature, through both enabling technology and applied technology efforts. By FY98, the program will develop and demonstrate manufacturing process feedback algorithms to actively control the cure state of composite resins. By FY00, it will demonstrate adaptive, out-of-autoclave tooling with preferential heating to optimize the cure cycle of co-cured composite elements of highly variable thickness. By FY01, the program will demonstrate airframe sections tailored for structural efficiency, producibility, and field supportability.

These demonstrations contribute to rotary-wing vehicle system level payoffs of a 55% increase in range or a 36% increase in payload, a 20% increase in reliability, a 10% improvement in maintainability, a 6% reduction in RDT&E costs, a 15% reduction in procurement costs, and a 5% reduction in operation and support costs over current technology.

These objectives will be achieved by executing a set of programs and demonstrations to overcome barriers such as nonintrusive monitoring components and techniques, and sensors, algorithms, and methods to improve design and manufacturing processes.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Robert Kennedy
HQ USAATCOM
(314) 263-1441
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Ted Hundley
USA Aviation Center
(205) 255-2704
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602211AA47A0.30.40.40.40.500
0603003AD3130.81.54.86.35.500
Total1.11.95.36.86.000

AP.15.00 Rotary-Wing Affordable/Supportable Subsystems Technologies. This DTO will demonstrate subsystems technologies leading to, by FY04, a 45% reduction in maintenance costs per flight hour per installed shaft horsepower over current technology via advanced concept evaluation and application in both enabling technology and applied technology efforts. By FY98, the program will demonstrate seeded fault validation testing. By FY00, the goal is to demonstrate dynamic component fault detectors and virtual maintenance tools. By FY02, the program will conduct aircraft modifications for advanced diagnostics and prognostics for on-board systems integration on an operational helicopter.

These demonstrations contribute to rotary-wing vehicle system level payoffs of a 20% improvement in maintainability, a 45% increase in reliability, and a 10% reduction in operation and support costs over current technology (FY05). These objectives will be achieved by executing a set of programs and demonstrations to overcome barriers such as non-intrusive monitoring components and techniques, and sensors, algorithms, and methods to permit real-time monitoring of flight loads and damage.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Robert Kennedy
HQ USAATCOM
(314) 263-1441
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Ted Hundley
USA Aviation Center
(205) 255-2704
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602211AA47A0.60.70.70.7000
0603003AD3130001.03.56.05.5
Total0.60.70.70.73.56.05.5

AP.16.00 Rotary-Wing Signature Reduction Technologies. This DTO will demonstrate subsystems technologies leading to, by FY05, a 40% reduction in radar cross section signature, a 50% reduction in infrared signature, and a 55% reduction in the visual/electro-optical signature over current technology, via evaluation and application of new concepts in both enabling technology and applied technology efforts. By FY99, the program will develop multispectral airframe coatings compatible with radar absorbing materials/structures and low-cost, lightweight thermal insulative materials. By FY00, it will demonstrate full-scale engine exhaust suppression concepts. By FY02, the program will develop selected state-of-the-art active/passive countermeasures and aircrew situational awareness concepts.

These demonstrations contribute to a rotary-wing vehicle TDA system level payoff of a 60% increase in probability of survival over current technology. These objectives will be achieved by executing a set of programs and demonstrations to overcome barriers such as the integration of both active and passive countermeasures to produce a mission-effective, survivable rotary-wing vehicle that is both supportable and affordable.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Mr. Robert Kennedy
HQ USAATCOM
(314) 263-1441
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Mr. Ted Hundley
USA Aviation Center
(205) 255-2704
Mr. Bill King
ONR Code 351
(703) 696-4109

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602211AA47A0.91.11.40.80.800
0603003AD313000001.75.3
Total0.91.11.40.80.81.75.3

AP.17.00 Hydrocarbon Scramjet Missile Propulsion. The goal of this program is to develop and demonstrate a hypersonic, air-breathing propulsion technology using liquid hydrocarbon (H/C) fuels. As the principal metric, a first-generation hydrocarbon-fueled, scramjet-integrated engine demonstrator will demonstrate sufficient thrust for accelerating an air-launched missile from Mach 4 end-of-boost to hypersonic cruise. The specific performance goal is for hydrocarbon scramjet operation from Mach 4 to 8 with the same specific thrust, and at least half the specific impulse of an equivalent hydrogen scramjet. Completion of this effort in FY02 will benchmark the initial state-of-the-art technology for hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet air-breathing propulsion.

This DTO will enable the development of revolutionary systems that satisfy a number of joint warfighting capability needs such as Precision Force, Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Joint Theater Missile Defense. The advantage of a hypersonic cruise missile is to reduce flight times by a factor of 7 below current systems, while increasing terminal kinetic/penetrating energy by a factor of 8. As a result of hydrocarbon fuel's high-energy density (four times greater than hydrogen), it is possible to develop missiles that can be carried on fighter and bomber aircraft. Furthermore, hydrocarbon-fueled systems do not require the complex and manpower-intensive "space launch" operations and maintenance procedures associated with cryogenically fueled systems. As a result, hydrocarbon-fueled weapon systems would be "all up rounds" similar to (C)ALCM/Tomahawk.

Technology developed under NASP offers the possibility of designing a fixed geometry scramjet for operation over an explicit flight corridor (fixed speed and altitude). The technology barrier is the ability to design an expendable/affordable (fixed geometry) H/C-fueled scramjet capable of accelerating an air-launched missile from Mach 4 to 8 hypersonic cruise. The specific challenges are (1) end-of-boost start of the combustor and operation at high dynamic pressure (1,500-2,500 lbf/ft2) and low-combustor inlet static temperature, (2) fuel injection and stable combustion during dual-mode (sonic/supersonic) combustor operation through the intermediate flight Mach numbers, (3) effective management of the flow-path pressure, shear/skin friction, and recombination losses during high Mach number cruise, (4) thermal management of the integrated airframe/engine configuration throughout the flight corridor, (5) survivability of flowpath structures in a high-temperature (T > 5,500°F) oxidizing environment, and (6) realistic simulation of flight conditions in ground-based test facilities.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602269F10257.29.813.013.013.912.813.0
0602203F30121.9000000
0603216F26970.3000000
Total9.49.813.013.013.912.813.0

AP.18.00 Improved JP-8 Fuel. By FY00, this DTO will demonstrate the benefits of an improved JP-8 fuel (JP-8+100) with a 100°F increase in thermal stability (from 325°F to 425°F in the bulk; from 400°F to 500°F wetted wall), and offers a 50% increase in heat sink through use of a detergent/dispersant additive package. The additive package (added at a concentration range of 100 to 300 parts per million) will significantly reduce gums, varnishes, and coke in mainburner fuel nozzles, manifolds, augmentor sprayrings/bars, and other fuel system components at a cost of less than $0.001 per gallon of fuel. Deposition in critical fuel system components such as mainburner fuel nozzles can lead to poor spray patterns, causing improper combustion and potential combustor and turbine damage. Deposition in augmentor sprayrings/bars can result in augmentor no lights and low-frequency rumble.

Development of JP-8+100 will result in the return of the thermal margin for the F-22 (and future upgrades) through a 100°F increase in fuel thermal stability and a 50% increase in fuel heat sink. These advances will result in increased fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, and higher performance capabilities for all weapon systems. In addition, for current weapons systems, the increased fuel thermal stability characteristics of JP-8+100 will result in less coke formation in engines and fuel systems, ultimately increasing reliability and mission capability rates and decreasing operation and maintenance costs. Reduced engine fouling and increased turbine engine nozzle cooling will decrease weapon system signature, thereby increasing survivability.

Technical barriers include understanding the fundamental and complex processes by which additives stop the formation of gums, varnishes, and coke in mainburner fuel nozzles, manifolds, augmentor sprayrings/bars, and other fuel system components; developing test methods that simulate aircraft fuel system conditions accurately enough to evaluate the effectiveness of candidate additives; assuring that candidate additives are compatible with both metallic and nonmetallic fuel system materials (to date over 200 materials have been tested); and developing the methodology to quantitatively verify that the additives reduce deposition in fuel systems. The detergents/dispersants used in current candidate additives can emulsify dirt and water in ground fuel handling systems, thereby disarming current filter coalescers. For logistical reasons, fleet-wide conversion will depend upon the development of a new generation of drop-in replacement filters/coalescers that are tolerant of detergents/dispersants yet provide the filtration and water removal required by current and future weapons systems.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0602203F30125.2000000
0603216F26971.9000000
0603216F248001.62.10000
Total7.11.62.10000

AP.19.00 High Heat Sink Fuels (JP-900/Endothermic). The objectives are to provide the propulsive energy and heat sink (cooling) capacity required (enabling) for HyTech and IHPTET Phase III advanced air-breathing propulsion systems by FY01 and FY03, respectively. JP-900 will provide about 700-Btu/lb heat sink capacity by remaining stable (no coking or fouling of fuel system components) up to 900°F. With endothermic capability, fuel will provide about 1,500-Btu/lb heat sink capacity by undergoing chemical change at temperatures up to 1200° F.

Application studies indicate that using fuel as a heat sink to cool the cooling air (compressor bleed) for an IHPTET Phase III demonstrator can result in a 5% increase in thrust-to-weight with a 1% reduction in specific fuel consumption while using Phase II materials. This will permit lower development, procurement, and life-cycle costs for advanced propulsion systems. This high heat sink capability (from a hydrocarbon fuel) will also enable Mach 8 scramjet propulsion formerly thought possible only with logistically unacceptable hydrogen fuel.

Technical barriers to providing the required heat sink capacity include preventing coking/fouling (caused by thermal degradation of the fuel as it is heated) in fuel system components; developing lightweight, safe, durable, affordable fuel/air heat exchangers or directly cooled structures that can transfer heat to the fuel at temperatures/pressures beyond the capability of current components; balancing and controlling the fuel flow (engine requirement for propulsive energy) with the heat sink (cooling) requirement of the system; and effectively injecting liquid, vapor, or supercritical fuel (with continually varying density, viscosity, enthalpy, and species) into the combustor.

Service/Agency POCUSD(A&T) POC Customer POC
Dr. Edward Curran
WL/PO
(513) 255-2520
Dr. Don Dix
DDR&E/AT
(703) 695-0005
Col Albert Falcione
HQ ACC/DRM
(804) 764-4325

Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions)
PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03
0603216F24800001.72.02.02.0
Total0001.72.02.02.0